Oracle breaks with tech industry to back sex trafficking legislation

Cloud computing behemoth Oracle has broken off from the standard tech sector line and decided to back a bipartisan proposal in the US Congress that would make it easier to penalize operators of websites that facilitate online sex trafficking.

The technology sector has, thus far, been firmly opposed to the legislation on the grounds that it would strangle innovation and lead to endless litigation.

“Your legislation does not, as suggested by the bill’s opponents, usher the end of the internet,” Kenneth Glueck, Oracle senior vice president, wrote in a letter to Republican Senator Rob Portman and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, chief architects of the proposal. “If enacted, it will establish some measure of accountability for those that cynically sell advertising but are unprepared to help curtail sex trafficking,” he continued.

The legislation would open up the potential for state legislators and victims to pursue legal action against Facebook, Google and other big tech giants if their measures to limit exploitative material are found to be insufficient.

This news came at the same time a new report was released which showed that tech entrepreneurs generally have very Democratic values, except when it comes to regulation. The report from the Stanford Business School suggested that when it comes to regulation tech entrepreneurs are as right-wing as Republican party donors, while being as left-wing as Democrat party donors on almost every other issue.

That being said, it would be fair to suggest that regulation has the potential to unduly affect the tech sector. It’s a sector often misunderstood by those less “tech-savvy”, who may well be lawmakers, and the pace of innovation is firstly very high and secondly part of the sectors identity. But while this might explain the sectors adversity to regulation it does not speak to how valid any individual regulation might be.

One point to consider in the latest case is that Oracle and Google have been rivals in a lawsuit that lasted six years – or seven, depending on whether you think it’s still going. Oracle runs cloud-based CRM-type systems for businesses to store data and processes, so is unlikely to be much affected by legislation which speaks to consumer advertising. It is conceivable that this move from Oracle is just the latest in its propensity to try and stitch up Google.

Ben Allen

Ben Allen is a traveller, a millennial and a Brit. He worked in the London startup world for a while but really prefers commenting on it than working in it. He has huge faith in the tech industry and enjoys talking and writing about the social issues inherent in its development.

Recent Posts

Shift left, ship fast: How software teams can offer speed without sacrificing quality (Brains Byte Back Podcast)

Even the biggest software companies understand that moving quickly is no longer a luxury; it's…

1 day ago

Extremists weaponize COVID, climate issues with conspiracy theories about state & elite control: RAND Europe

The RAND Europe authors are so stuck in their own echo chamber they don't realize…

5 days ago

Digital ID, vaccine passports are expanding to pets & livestock: UN AI for Good report

Humans, animals & commodities alike are all to be digitally tagged, tracked-and-traced equally: perspective The…

1 week ago

Teaching with tech: What’s changing and why It Matters (Brains Byte Back Podcast)

Teaching has changed a lot over the years, from chalkboards to laptops, from printed worksheets…

1 week ago

‘Enormously intrusive’ collaborative sensing is beneficial to society: WEF podcast

The massive city-wide surveillance that collaborative sensing requires is a tremendous temptation for tyrants: perspective…

2 weeks ago

AI set to transform Product Development Lifecycle with new software engineering workbench

Innovation in software can lay claim to the very solutions that today have become the…

2 weeks ago